This information was originally posted on March 20, 2008. If this information is time sensitive, please do a reality check and put things in their proper context. Some of the old information is still useful, which is why we've left it here in the archives. Thanks.
Article 5 in a series discussing PTA and PTO
When considering whether the Central parents group should continue its affiliation with the national PTA, it is instructive to ask: How well does our mission fit with that of the national organization?
Though incomplete, Central PTA archives show that the priorities of our group have changed over time. What started in 1893 as an effort to beautify the school, a few decades later had become primarily about parent education, and then evolved further to the group it is today. Indeed, the activities and programs of our PTA today make clear the following priorities:
- To make possible academic, cultural, and recreational opportunities which are otherwise beyond the means of the school district;
- To build a sense of community among parents and staff;
- To educate and support parents in their role as advocates for their child’s education, and for the education of all children in the district;
- To facilitate communication between parents, principal, and school board.
In other words, our focus is on the educational experience specifically in our school and district.
The national organization, by comparison, has a preference for advocacy on a broader scale, as reflected in the following official objectives, which are required to be in our bylaws:*
- To promote the welfare of children and youth in home, school, community, and place of worship;
- To raise the standards of home life;
- To secure adequate laws for the care and protection of children and youth;
- To bring into closer relation the home and the school, that parents and teachers may cooperate intelligently in the education of children and youth;
- To develop between educators and the general public such united efforts as will secure for all children and youth the highest advantages in physical, mental, social, and spiritual education.
So the question becomes: do we want to continue to be part of an organization whose philosophy, though worthy, is largely out of sync with our own?
What would be possible as a PTO that isn’t as a PTA?
Complete autonomy and, potentially, more inclusivity. (For example: we could decide whether or not to require dues as a condition of membership.)
Is there anything possible as a PTA that we’d lose as a PTO?
“Reflections” is a PTA sponsored program in which we would no longer be eligible to participate. It may be possible to participate in similar programs sponsored by other organizations.
Isn’t parent advocacy important on more than just a school level?
Yes. But, if enough interest exists, our PTO could sponsor educational programs on how individuals can effectively advocate for their beliefs. Right now, your dues support the national PTA platform, whether you agree with it or not.
* For more information on national PTA mission and philosophy, visit www.pta.org.
*Central PTA convened a committee to investigate the trend of parent groups converting to PTOs. Members include: Anne Kodama, Nancy Hopkins, Mary Jo Robling, Jane Wilhelm, and Mary Ellen Meindl. Questions about this article can be directed to any of these committee members.